Jobs backdating Keralasexphotos
This is not always the case, according to a ruling by federal judge William Alsup of the U. District Court for the Northern District of California.According to Alsup’s reasoning and subsequent ruling, it is improper to infer fraudulent activity based solely on the occurrence of options backdating – further facts must be present and proven before the act can be considered to be fraudulent.If a company grants options on June 1 (when the stock price is 0), but backdates the options to May 15 (when the price was ) in order to make the option grants more favorable to the grantees, the fact remains that the grants were actually made on June 1, and if the exercise price of the granted options is , not 0, it is below fair market value.Thus, backdating can be misleading to shareholders in the sense that it results in option grants that are more favorable than the shareholders approved in adopting the stock option plan.To avoid having to pay higher taxes, many companies adopted a policy of issuing “at the money” stock options in lieu of additional income, with the idea that the executive or employee would benefit through the option by working to increase the value of the company without exceeding the one million dollar deductibility cap for executive income.When company executives discovered that they had the ability to backdate stock option grants, thus making them both tax deductible and “in the money” on the date of actual issuance, the common practice of stock option backdating for financial gain began on a widespread level.For instance, public companies generally grant stock options in accordance with a formal stock option plan approved by shareholders at an annual meeting.Many companies' stock option plans provide that stock options must be granted at an exercise price no lower than fair market value on the date of the option grant.
This all but eliminated the opportunity for senior management to engage any meaningful options backdating.Cases of backdating employee stock options have drawn public and media attention.According to a study by Erik Lie, a finance professor at the University of Iowa, more than 2,000 companies used options backdating in some form to reward their senior executives between 19.The problem with this practice, according to the SEC, was that stock option backdating, while difficult to prove, could be considered a criminal act.One of the larger backdating scandals occurred at Brocade Communications, a data storage company.
Options backdating may still occur under the new reporting regulations, but Sarbanes-Oxley compliant backdating is far less likely to be used for dishonest reasons due to the short time frame that is allowed for reporting.